My time has been split between attending literary events and public health workshops. I’m trying to catch up my blog with all of these happenings. One thing at a time. Written installments that try frantically to keep pace with my life. Always writing in past tense. Always speaking in fragments when the objective is to make connections; create holistic meaning.
Recently I traipsed through the American Folk Art Museum to catch the last day of a Henry Darger exhibit. The exhibit showcased the work of Darger and a handful of artists he has influenced. Amy Cutler’s paintings corralled the majority of my attention (I had seen one of her paintings over a year ago at the Brooklyn Museum, but had forgotten about her until this recent rediscovery).
From far away the girls in Cutler’s pieces look nearly identical, but upon closer scrutiny, each face and expression denotes distinct personality. I appreciated Cutler’s prompt to look closely and to ponder the little mysteries of her work. Domestic spaces and quaintly attired female figures provoke curiosity through absurdities such as people being rolled into Persian rugs, girls’ hair seamlessly braided together, and/or strange crafts being conducted with women’s hair. The coils of hair providing a life line between and providing a resource for the arts and crafts of these depicted characters offers a nesting doll dialogue about folk art that comments on itself, that captures the act of crafting in a landscape of folk costumes with a heavy dose of surrealist, fairy tale intrigue. Adding to the quiet, wintry provocation of the paintings is the negative space: white consumes much of the work, sometimes providing little, if any, sense of space and horizon. Cutler also demonstrates a fascination with private, small spaces—a child-like whimsy akin to setting up a personal headquarters in a closet or investigating and cherishing all of the components and compartments of a doll house (as in Katherine Mansfield’s “The Doll House,” and Kezia’s love of the little lamp).
A contemporary Chinese-American artist was also featured in the exhibit: Yun-Fei Ji. His cramped and interesting work can be viewed here. Exploring the juxtaposition of text and image (Darger provided illustrations for his novels), the exhibit nodded to traditional Chinese art--fusing word and image in flowing, thick, black-tipped brushstrokes.
Earlier, I was reading an interview with Lynda Barry (a self-taught artist, and in many ways, connected to this idea of American “folk arts”) who discussed the link between text and picture, as well as its roots in Chinese art. For Barry, art is a response to compulsion and necessity, and thought projects images into the theater of the mind. Barry would have been a nice addition to this exhibit, adding to the discourse with contributions by graphic novelists—as “outsider” artists, as celebrating the marriage of illustration and written language, etc.
However, it is clear that the marriage of text and the visual arts is not to explicate. Despite Darger’s outpour of narrative, ambiguity chokes his precise message and vision. Little girls infest battlegrounds with flaccid penises . . . What more can be said? It is a worthy image of analytical debate that leaves me pensive and fearful of loquacity. It is a jolting mascot for an adolescent-like awkwardness that never fully departs after crossing the hazy threshold into adulthood.
